Wednesday, February 14, 2018

REZULTATE FEBR. 2018

For those who failed, please note the format and acceptable (identitty construction) theme as per webpage instructions:
· Final written assignment. The final written assignment is a 6-page critical essay. In order for the essay to be taken into consideration it must: 
a) be based on preliminary negotiation of the theme, the approach, the format and the structure of the argument, 
b) have a clearly stated theme, approach and structure, 
c) comply with the style of an academic critical essay (references, bibliography, editing etc.). 
Please note that the theme has to deal with the (construction of a) cultural identity of a (national/ethnic etc.) group and the approach must be derived from the area of discourse studies (rhetoric, pragmatics, DA/CDA, power and discourse etc.) and/or political/ideology studies. Work in the form of personal essay, editorial journalism, historical overview will not be taken into account. "

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

NUME
PREZENTE
ACTIV SEMINAR
ESEU FINAL
NOTA CATALOG
OBSERVATII
BUDURU TEODORA
7
5
4
FAIL
not in keeping with the format and identitarian theme I requested
CERCEL DENIS
6
8
4
FAIL

CERCEL RALUCA
5
5
?
FAIL
lacking seminar assignments
CHIRICĂ MIRUNA-IOANA
6
8
4
FAIL
not in keeping with the format and identitarian theme I requested
COZMA GEORGIANA-MIRUNA
6
8
8.00
8

DIDULESCU DENYSE
5
10
6
8

HAGIU ȘERBAN ANDREI
5
8
7
8
disjointed argument, little connection with the subject matter of this class; occasionally, the author's attitude to Hitler seems ambiguous.
HAIMED LINA-DANA
4
5
4
FAIL
not in keeping with the format and identitarian theme I requested
IAMANDI ANCA
5
10
9
10

ION CRISTIAN MIHAI
5
8
6
7
not in keeping with the format and identitarian theme I requested
IONAȘCU THEODORA
5
5
5
6
unclear argument, self-contradictions, unscientific sources.
MĂCĂNEAȚĂ ANDRA
4
8
4
FAIL
not in keeping with the format and identitarian theme I requested
MALCIU CLAUDIA-MARILENA
1
5
?
FAIL
failed in the 1st exam session (poor attendance); to resit the exam, you must write an additional 3-page-long essay to compensate for poor attendance
MICLĂUȘ ANDREEA MARIA
7
8
7
8
too much history, too many clichees, not enough personal processing and case analysis.
MANSOUR GHUFRAN AIJAD
5
5
4
FAIL
hardly any personal contribution in this essay; not in keeping with the format and theme I requested
NEAGU MAGDALENA IRINA
4
5
4.5
5
replete with serious language mistakes, nor really proving control of any of the approaches studied in this class.
NICA ALEXANDRA
1
5
?
FAIL
failed in the 1st exam session (poor attendance); to resit the exam, you must write an additional 3-page-long essay to compensate for poor attendance
NIȚĂ ELIZA
6
5
8.5
8

NIȚĂ LORENA
2
5
?
FAIL
failed in the 1st exam session (poor attendance); to resit the exam, you must write an additional 3-page-long essay to compensate for poor attendance
PANARIU IRINA-ELENA
4
8
?
FAIL
lacking seminar assignments
POSTICA VICTORIA
1
5
?
FAIL
failed in the 1st exam session (poor attendance); to resit the exam, you must write an additional 3-page-long essay to compensate for poor attendance
TOMA MIHAI
7
8
9.5
10

ULIANOV IOANA
4
8
9
9

VELOIU ALEXANDRA
7
8
?
FAIL
no final essay

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

REZULTATE FINALE FEB 2016

Dragii mei,
Aveti mai jos rezultatele finale. Cei care nu au obtinut nota de trecere pot reincerca trimitindu-mi notele de lectura/conspectele si eseurile refacute in ultima saptamina din mai, imediat inainte de sesiunea de restante. (Daca mi-ati trimis conspectele si dintr-un motiv ori altul nu mi-au parvenit, mai puteti sa mi le retrimiteti miine ca sa va salvati media.)
Va multumesc pentru colaborare si va urez succes in acest final de ciclu universitar.
B.Stefanescu

NUME
PREZ.
ACTIVIT
SEMIN.
READING NOTES
ESEU FINAL
MEDIA FINALA
OBSERVATII
Cirstescu Alina
5
7
9
5,00
7
eseul e un simplu comentariu literar de scoala/liceu, nu razbate nimic din discutia teoretica si din metodologia studiate la curs
Cristea Gabriela
5
4
2
5,00
5
fara reading notes, eseul e "uninformed opinion" - nu are nimic de-a face cu discutia teoretica si din metodologia studiate la curs
Dobrita Laura
4
2
5
4,00
PICAT
eseul (plin de greseli) e un simplu comentariu literar de scoala/liceu, nu razbate nimic din discutia teoretica si din metodologia studiate la curs; prez.insufic.
Dumitru Daniel Costin
7
10
5
6,00
7
reading notes - doar 1 din 6 titluri din bibl.; eseul nu defineste termenii (anarhism, socialism etc.), argumentatia e sovaitoare
Iamandi Florin
5
10
4
10,00
9
(reading notes?)
Leaua Andreea Catalina
5
7
9
5,00
7
eseul e un simplu comentariu literar de scoala/liceu, nu razbate nimic din discutia teoretica si din metodologia studiate la curs
Lucacs Mihai
4
7

6,00
7
eseul fara legatura cu constructia identitara, prez. insufic.
Maier Alexandra
5
10
10
10,00
10

Malita (Radulescu) Mirela
5
5
9
9
9

Memet Denisa
4
4
2
5,00
5
fara reading notes; eseul nu discuta constructia identitara, engl. este f. carenta, prezenta insuf.
Minculescu Adina
5
7
9
6,00
7
eseul=periplu istorist, fara analiza discursului identitar
Panduru Madalina
4
7
2
0,00
PICAT
fara reading notes si fara eseu, prez. Insuficienta
Popescu Roxana
5
9
10
10,00
10

Purcherea Adela
5
7
7
7,00
7
confuzii intre nationalism si sovinism/xenofobie/rasism etc.
Puteanu Georgiana
7
5
9
9,00
9

Radu Roxana
6
10
10
10,00
10

Rascov Catalin
6
8
2
10,00
8
 fara reading notes
Stancu Cristina
6
10
10
9,50
10

Stoenescu Anca Cristina
5
7
8
5,00
6
nu sint folosite nici notiuni de studiul ideologiilor politice, nici analiza retorica/discursiva
Toader Valentina Ioana
2
4
2
0,00
PICAT
fara reading notes si fara eseu, prez. Insuficienta
Vasile Vlad
6
5
2
8,00
7
fara reading notes; prea putin despre constructia identitatii culturale a unui grup
Voicu Elena Diana
4
4
2
1,00
PICAT
eseu PLAGIAT; fara reading notes; prezenta insuficienta
Zuo Dragomirescu Vlad Quan
5
4
2
4,50
5
fara reading notes; nici o legatura cu constructia unei identitati culturale, nici o analiza a discursului, nici o legatura cu ce am discutat la curs